Facebook (Nasdaq: FB) is a company that grew into a market leader by creating a market. In 2010, the company was so well respected that a movie covered the company’s story.
In “The Social Network,” viewers learned that “in 2003, Harvard undergrad and computer genius Mark Zuckerberg (Jesse Eisenberg) begins work on a new concept that eventually turns into the global social network known as Facebook.
Six years later, he is one of the youngest billionaires ever, but Zuckerberg finds that his unprecedented success leads to both personal and legal complications when he ends up on the receiving end of two lawsuits, one involving his former friend (Andrew Garfield). Based on the book “The Accidental Billionaires.”
The award winning movie was a hit with viewers, critics and award shows.
- Screw Up All Of Your Trades And Still Bank Monthly Gains The Perfect Trading Strategy for risk-averse conservative traders who want consistent, predictable and reliable weekly and monthly income from trading stocks… even when… they are 100% WRONG on every trade. Over a recent 30-day period, a well-known trader used this conservative trading technique to earn a substantial $13,241.50. He explains everything (and shows you the PROOF) in his just-released video report. I won’t leave this video up forever. So watch now because you’re about to discover some things about active trading for weekly and monthly income you’ve never seen before.
But much as changed since then. In particular, much changed after the 2012 election for President. Vox explained,
“Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm that did digital work for Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016, is reportedly shutting down after recent ethical and legal questions about its business practices.
The Wall Street Journal’s Rebecca Ballhaus and Jenny Gross report that both Cambridge and its British parent company, SCL Group, will disband amid a growing series of scandals.
In March, the New York Times and Observer reported that Cambridge obtained private Facebook data — specifically, information on tens of millions of Facebook profiles — from an outside researcher who provided it to them in violation of his own agreement with Facebook.
“We believe the Facebook information of up to 87 million people — mostly in the US — may have been improperly shared with Cambridge Analytica,” Facebook’s chief technology officer wrote.
Around the same time, Channel 4 News in the UK posted video in which Cambridge CEO Alexander Nix says his firm conducts dirty tricks such as trying to tape its candidates’ opponents accepting purported bribes or sending “some girls around to the [opposing] candidate’s house.”
Even before all this, though, Cambridge was under scrutiny in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election — both because Nix contacted Julian Assange of WikiLeaks that summer to discuss hacked Democratic emails and because of broader questions about whether Trump’s digital operation collaborated with Russians in some way.
(An ABC News report says Mueller’s team has been interviewing witnesses about the campaign’s digital team this year.)
And while all this was going on, there’s also been a heated debate in the political world about just what in the world Cambridge Analytica even does — and whether it’s useful.”
It’s a complex problem but one that Vox explained in a diagram:
This was the start of problems associated with concerns about privacy and these problems have compounded.
A Potential Find
CNBC recently reported, “The Federal Trade Commission is considering imposing a “record-setting fine” against Facebook for allegedly failing to protect users’ data, The Washington Post reported Friday. Three people familiar with the discussions but unauthorized to speak on the record reportedly told the Post about the fine.
Facebook’s stock slid slightly after the Post’s report was published, but shares remained positive for the day.
Facebook was accused of misusing personal information of its users when reports last year found political consultant agency Cambridge Analytica used personal information from millions of Facebook users without their explicit consent.
Following the reports in March, the FTC launched an investigation into the company’s data practices.
The fine is expected to be in excess of the $22.5 million fine the FTC imposed on Google in 2012 for allegedly violating an agreement to improve privacy practices, the Post reported. Sources told the Post Facebook has talked with FTC staffers about the investigation.
Facebook signed a consent decree with the FTC in 2011 that required the company to receive explicit permission from users before sharing their personal data. In March, Bloomberg reported that the FTC’s probe would look into whether Facebook violated the agreement.
Since the details of Cambridge Analytica came to light, a number of other data privacy scandals have come up as well. Last month, the company admitted it allowed other major tech firms to read users’ private messages, though it denies that this was done without users’ consent.
The company also disclosed a security breach in September that impacted as many as 50 million users. It later said only 30 million had been affected.
Facebook declined to comment. FTC employees are furloughed during the government shutdown and could not be reached for comment.”
The Fine Might Be No Problem
A record setting fine might not be significant for Facebook which has more than $9.6 billion in cash.
Source: Standard & Poor’s
With the resources to pay any penalties imposed and to continue investing in its operations, this could make the stock a bargain. After its significant sell off over the past year.
Analysts expect FB to report earnings per share (EPS) of $7.39 last year, $7.42 in 2019 and $8.57 in 2020. The company is expected to report fourth quarter and full year results for 2018 around February 4. That could be an important moment for the stock and could result in volatility.
In the long run, analysts expect EPS growth to average about 18% a year. The earnings growth rate can be used as a valuation metric known as the PEG ratio. This metric compares the stock’s P/E ratio to the company’s reported EPS growth rate.
The PEG ratio recognizes that investors are willing to pay a premium for growth. In fact, companies growing earnings at 18% a year, for example, should have a higher P/E ratio than a company that is growing earnings at 3% a year.
The PEG ratio recognizes this fact. The ratio is found by dividing the P/E ratio by the EPS growth rate. A ratio of 1.0 indicates a stock is fairly valued. PEG ratios less than 1 highlight stocks that are undervalued no matter what their P/E ratio is. PEG ratios greater than 1 show a stock is potentially overvalued.
Using this metric, FB could be worth about $133 a share and by this method is overvalued at the current price. That means investors could consider waiting for a better price before buying.