Remember when everyone was convinced Big Tech's AI spending would eventually hit a wall? Yeah, about that. Goldman Sachs just threw a wrench into that narrative, and it's a pretty hefty one. The bank's latest analysis suggests that Wall Street has been massively underestimating how much hyperscalers—think Google, Amazon, Microsoft—will actually spend on AI infrastructure. We're talking roughly $1.1 trillion in 2027, compared to the $920 billion Wall Street is currently expecting. In a bullish scenario? Try $1.4 trillion. That's not a rounding error; that's a whole different ballgame. Here's ...

The bull market's been charging for three years straight now, and everyone's wondering: does it keep going, or does it finally run out of steam? Here's the thing—2025 was wild. The S&P 500 climbed about 18% year-to-date, the Nasdaq jumped 22%, and the Dow hit all-time highs. That's on top of 24% and 23% gains in 2023 and 2024, respectively. If you're keeping score, that's three consecutive years of double-digit returns. Not bad. But here's where it gets interesting: Wall Street can't agree on what happens next. **The Optimists vs. The Skeptics** On the bullish side, Oppenheimer's throwing ...

Remember when everyone was convinced AI would destroy the world? Now they're convinced it'll destroy their portfolios. Plot twist: they're probably wrong on both counts. Last week, the market threw a tantrum over an AI selloff. Broadcom got blamed for kicking it off, but here's the thing—the company just posted nearly 50% revenue growth, 80% semiconductor revenue growth, and a $30 billion backlog. That's not weakness; that's a company drowning in demand. If that's a red flag, I'm a flamingo. So what actually spooked everyone? Three things, really. First, Iran tensions pushing oil toward $110...

Goldman Sachs reveals Wall Street is underestimating AI infrastructure spending—potentially $1.1 trillion in 2027. Token consumption expected to explode 24x by 2030, but productivity gains remain unproven.

Remember when everyone was convinced the Nasdaq was unstoppable? Yeah, about that. Bank of America's technical strategists just threw a wet blanket on the tech rally, and they're not being subtle about it. The Nasdaq 100 has been on a tear lately, breaking through the 30,000 barrier like it's nothing. But here's the thing: when something goes up too fast, it tends to come back down. And BofA's team is waving red flags like they're working airport ground crew. The culprit? Something called the Relative Strength Index (RSI)—basically a fancy way of measuring whether an asset is overbought or o...

Picture this: It's 2 a.m. on a Tuesday, and you're wide awake wondering if you should buy that stock. Soon, you might actually be able to. Nasdaq just announced it's gunning for 24-hour trading, five days a week—basically turning the stock market into the financial equivalent of a 7-Eleven. Here's the deal: Right now, the market opens at 9:30 a.m. and closes at 4 p.m. ET. Nasdaq wants to blow that wide open and let people trade around the clock. They're filing with the SEC soon, with a target launch in the second half of 2026. The NYSE already threw their hat in the ring last fall with a simi...

Here's the thing about IPO day: everyone's watching the wrong number. When SpaceX hits the Nasdaq tomorrow, financial media will lose its collective mind over the first-day pop. And yeah, it'll probably be huge. But here's what nobody tells you—that massive gain? It's not for you. Let me introduce you to Jay Ritter, a professor at the University of Florida who's basically the IPO whisperer. His database covers 45 years and over 9,300 offerings. Goldman cites him. JPMorgan cites him. The SEC cites him. And his data is absolutely brutal for retail investors chasing IPO hype. The First-Day Pop...